|
|
Post by Clone on Dec 9, 2008 19:22:48 GMT -4
Windows 7 is slotted to be the 7th major release of the Windows OS. the current estimated release date is in late 2009 to 2010. 7 has so far been shown running on machines with as little as 64MB of RAM, and also has been benchmarked in its early beats, these numbers have been vary promising. early numbers indicate a minimum of a 100% boost over current Vista scores. more can be found by simply searching Windows 7 or by simply clicking on some of the links. en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_7www.windowsvienna.com/news.cnet.com/windows-7-a-better-vista/ |
|
|
|
Post by The Italian Dragon on Dec 10, 2008 3:45:22 GMT -4
I hope that it won't s*ck as Vista does  |
|
|
|
Post by Clone on Dec 10, 2008 23:11:57 GMT -4
Vista sucks? ive been using it on a mid range system from 2007 and have only seen one problem, and that came when installing SP1.
|
|
|
|
Post by The Italian Dragon on Dec 11, 2008 10:43:51 GMT -4
Err... In Italy Vista had the Price of the Worts OS ever created 0.0 . So I'm a bit sceptical, but I trust you ;D
|
|
|
|
Post by Stingray on Dec 11, 2008 19:20:06 GMT -4
I hava a Vista and its the best computer I ever used.  |
|
|
|
Post by Clone on Dec 11, 2008 19:46:27 GMT -4
Same, but then again I came to it from a 2000 PC so there’s some leeway in my opinion on it. But a friend of mine recently got a Vista Laptop and has all together stopped using his XP machine. To me that speaks much more.
Shour it cost the most out of all the OS’s but let’s look at inflation. A 100$ back in the 1990’s was worth one hell of a lot more than it is now a days. Plus, Apples even worse on there pricing…
|
|
|
|
Post by Rekek Listen on Feb 15, 2009 0:34:19 GMT -4
Thats because the kid with the laptop, whom i know of which you speak, has the vista layout on his XP machine, and hes used to it. Thanks to... Points at someone in particular.
Hey mac-owners here is a secret, press Control + Eject on your keyboard and it will speed up your computer!
|
|
|
|
Post by The Italian Dragon on Feb 21, 2009 11:44:58 GMT -4
For Vista users you should look the process who are running : I have xP and I use a lot of programs and I have about 30-35 processes. My best friend has Vista and has over 80 processes Oo. So sry if I seem lame but I won't use Vista, even if I have 4 GB of ram ( and I have).
|
|
|
|
Post by Clone on Feb 23, 2009 17:38:20 GMT -4
Looks at processes on Vista, Xp and Win7
Vista 66
XP 48
Win7 52
I don’t see any coloration to the difference in performance from this.
What you need to keep in mind is not the processes but the processor clock, threading, and its calculations per second. Then you can determine where your process bottle neck may occur (in up in the 400+ range =) )
(By the way, Vista is SP1, XP is SP3 and Win 7 is with all patches up till this post)
One thing to keep in mind about Vista and XP is that Vista dos much, much more for the user than XP dose so don’t go bashing it for having more process
|
|
